DOI: 10.12890/2025_005868

Inadequate absorption of intramuscular anti-D immunoglobulin in a pregnant woman with a high body mass index

Authors

  • Ivica Marić Slovenian Institute for Transfusion Medicine, Ljubljana, Slovenia 0009-0004-9377-0211
  • Klara Železnik Slovenian Institute for Transfusion Medicine, Ljubljana, Slovenia

ivica.maric@ztm.si

Keywords

D antigen, alloimmunisation, anti-D immunoglobulin, intramuscular injection, obesity

Abstract

Introduction: The D antigen is highly immunogenic, and alloanti-D antibodies in maternal blood may cause haemolytic disease of the foetus and newborn. Prophylactic administration of anti-D immunoglobulin (Ig) to D-negative pregnant women significantly reduces the risk of alloimmunisation. However, absorption after intramuscular (IM) injection may be impaired in obese women.
Case description: We report the case of a 27-year-old D-negative pregnant woman body mass index (BMI) 35 kg/m2 who received three IM injections of anti-D Ig during pregnancy and after caesarean section. Despite confirmed administration, her indirect antiglobulin tests (IATs) remained negative or only borderline positive. Investigations excluded weak/partial D variants, foetomaternal haemorrhage, chimerism, and other causes. Due to her high BMI, we hypothesised that the injections were administered into subcutaneous fat, resulting in minimal absorption. After intravenous administration of anti-D Ig, the IAT became strongly positive, confirming correct drug delivery.
Conclusion: This case highlights the importance of considering maternal BMI in the administration of anti-D Ig. In obese women, inadequate IM administration may compromise prophylaxis. Intravenous administration or the use of alternative injection sites should be considered.

View the entire article

Downloads

References

  1. Kennedy MS, Delaney M, Scrape S. Perinatal issues in transfusion medicine. In: Fung MK, Grossman BJ, Hillyer CD, Westhoff CM. Technical manual, 18th ed. Bethesda: AABB, 2014. p. 561-570
  2. Brinc D, Lazarus AH. Mechanisms of anti-D action in the prevention of haemolytic disease of the newborn. ASH Education Book January 1, 2009 vol. 2009 no. 1 185-191.
  3. Pravilnik o transfuzijskih preiskavah in postopkih ob transfuziji (Low about blood transfusion investigations and procedures with transfusion). Uradni list RS, st. 9/2007, 2007 (The Official Gazette of the Republic of Slovenia, no. 9/2007, 2007).
  4. Rhophylac: Summary of Product Characteristics [Internet]; [cited 2025 Sep 15]. Available from: Health Professional Information Leaflet.
  5. Rhesonativ: Summary of Product Characteristics [Internet]; [cited 2025 Sep 15]. Available from: Rhesonativ 625 IU per ml solution for injection ENG SmPC_09001bee807a752b.pdf
  6. Chan VO, Colville J, Persaud T, Buckley O, Hamilton S, Torreggiani WC. Intramuscular injections into the buttocks: are they truly intramuscular? Eur J Radiol 2006;58:480-484. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2006.01.008
  7. Zaybak A, Günes UY, Tamsel S, Khorshid L, Esser I. Does obesity prevent the needle from reaching muscle in intramuscular injections? J Adv Nurs 2007;58:552-556. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04264.x
  8. Qureshi H, Massey E, Kirwan D, Davies T, Robson S, White J, et al. BCSH guideline for the use of anti-D immunoglobulin for the prevention of haemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn. Transfus Med 2014;24:8-20. doi: 10.1111/tme.12091
  9. Bichler J, Schöndorfer G, Pabst G, Andresen I. Pharmacokinetics of anti-D IgG in pregnant RhD-negative women. BJOG 2003;110:39-45
  10. MacKenzie IZ, Roseman F, Findlay J, Thompson K, Jackson E, Scott J, et al. The kinetics of routine antenatal prophylactic intramuscular injections of polyclonal anti-D immunoglobulin. BJOG 2006;113:97-101. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2005.00789.x
  11. Woelfer B, Schuchter K, Janisiw M, Hafner E, Philipp K, Panzer S. Postdelivery levels of anti-D IgG prophylaxis in D- mothers depend on maternal body weight. Transfusion 2004;44:512-517. doi: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2004.03287.x
  12. Ngan CBM, Kaur R, Jackson DE. Does high body mass index (>25 kg/m2) or weight (>80 kg) reduce the effectiveness of anti-D prophylaxis in Rh(D)-negative pregnant women? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Vox Sang 2024;119:902-911. doi: 10.1111/vox.13693
  13. Expert Panel Consensus Position Statement regarding the Use of Rh(D) Immunoglobulin in Patients with a Body Mass Index > 30 [Internet]; [cited 2025 Sep 15]. Available from: Use of Rh(D) Immunoglobulin in Patients with High BMI (Australian Red Cross Blood Service and NBA Consensus Position Statement)

Published

2025-11-24

How to Cite

1.
Marić I, Železnik K. Inadequate absorption of intramuscular anti-D immunoglobulin in a pregnant woman with a high body mass index. EJCRIM [Internet]. 2025 Nov. 24 [cited 2026 Nov. 3];12(12). Available from: https://ejcrim.com/index.php/ejcrim/article/view/5868