DOI: 10.12890/2014_000042
Can This Be Considered Fondaparinux-induced Thrombocytopenia?
Authors
barbaramariotti@libero.it
Abstract
We present a case of an old woman with previously documented heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT),treated with fondaparinux, who presented with thrombocytopenia and venous thrombosis after exposure to a preventive dose of fondaparinux duringorthopaedic surgery.
Any accidental exposure to heparin was avoided. Other causes of thrombocytopenia were excluded andantigenic tests combined with clinical probability made a diagnosis of HIT likely.
Can this be considered a possible case of fondaparinux-related HIT, despite the intense and earlydecrease in platelets, as usually happens in rapid-onset HIT, and the fact that previous exposure to fondaparinux had occurred 5 months previously?
References
- Linkins L-A, Dans AL, Moores LK et al. Treatment and prevention of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia: antithrombotic therapy and prevention of thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines, Chest 2012;141:S495–S528.
- Warkentin TE. HIT lights: a career perspective on heparin-induced thrombocytopenia, Am J Hematol 2012;87:S92–S99.
- Cuker A, Arepally G, Crowther MA et al. The HIT Expert Probability (HEP) Score: a novel pre-test probability model for heparin-induced thrombocytopenia based on broad expert opinion, J Thromb Haemost 2010;8:2642–2650.
- Warkentin TE. HIT paradigms and paradoxes, J Thromb Haemost 2011;9 (Suppl. 1):105–117.
- Alsaleh KA, Al-Nasser SM, Bates SM et al. Delayed-onset HIT caused by low-molecular-weight heparin manifesting during fondaparinux propylaxis, Am J Hematol 2008;83(11):876–878.