Triple-positive antiphospholipid syndrome with splenic infarction triggered by tocilizumab withdrawal in a high-titer ACPA-positive rheumatoid arthritis patient: an unmasking storm of polyautoimmunity
Rheumatology Clinic, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy
Corresponding author’s e-mail: francesco.coviello@unifg.it
Received: 07/06/2026
Accepted: 17/07/2026
Published: 21/10/2026
Conflicts of Interests: The Authors declare that there are no competing interests.
Patient Consent: Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for the anonymous publication of his medical history and clinical documentation.
Declaration of generative AI and AI-assisted technologies in the manuscript preparation process: Notebook LM was used to generate Figure 2. The corresponding author reviewed and verified the AI-assisted output for accuracy and took full responsibility for it.
This article is licensed under a CC Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License
How to cite this article: Coviello FE, Rotondo C, D’Onofrio F, Barile R, Cantatore FP, Corrado A. Triple-positive antiphospholipid syndrome with splenic infarction triggered by tocilizumab withdrawal in a high-titer ACPA-positive rheumatoid arthritis patient: an unmasking storm of polyautoimmunity. EJCRIM 2026;13:doi:10.12890/2026_007169
Introduction: We describe the occurrence of an uncommon thrombotic event, namely splenic infarction, as the onset of antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) after temporary suspension of anti-IL-6 treatment in a patient with rheumatoid arthritis (RA).
Case description: A 53-year-old patient with anti-citrullinated protein antibody (ACPA) and rheumatoid factor-positive RA, previously showing transient positivity for immunoglobulin (Ig)G anticardiolipin antibodies and lupus anticoagulant (LAC), refractory to multiple biological disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs), anti-tumour necrosis factor (TNF)-α agents, and rituximab, had been treated with tocilizumab since 2013 with good clinical response. After temporary suspension of tocilizumab for minor orthopaedic surgery complicated by skin abscess, he developed acute abdominal pain and computed tomography evidence of splenic infarction. Laboratory evaluation revealed elevated inflammatory markers and triple positivity for LAC, aCL IgG, and aB2GPI IgG, leading to the diagnosis of APS. Treatment with warfarin, methotrexate, and baricitinib resulted in stable disease control without recurrent thrombotic events.
Conclusion: Clinical stability in RA is a delicate balance between control of inflammation and avoidance of medication toxicity, especially in patients with high thrombotic risk and previous antiphospholipid positivity. Temporary withdrawal of biologic therapy may induce immunological rebound and thrombotic complications. This case highlights the importance of thrombotic risk stratification and multidisciplinary management when biologic therapies are suspended.
Rheumatoid arthritis, splenic infarction, antiphospholipid syndrome, tocilizumab, anti-TNF, pathogenesis
Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is a systemic autoimmune disease characterized by thromboembolic events associated with antiphospholipid antibodies. The 2023 American College of Rheumatology (ACR)/ European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology (EULAR) classification criteria emphasize the integration of autoimmune serology and clinical manifestations, requiring at least one laboratory and one clinical criterion for diagnosis[1]. APS may occur as a primary disorder or secondary to autoimmune diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis (RA), where prevalence ranges from 5% to 75%[2]. Previous reports described APS onset after anti-tumour necrosis factor (TNF)-α therapy, suggesting that biologic agents may promote autoantibody formation or thrombosis in predisposed patients[3]. Arterial thrombosis is one of the main manifestations of APS and often involves unusual anatomical locations. Hepatic thrombosis is the most common gastrointestinal macrovascular involvement and splenic infarction is rare; therefore, it may represent the first clinical sign of APS[4]. We report a case of APS presenting as splenic infarction after temporary suspension of tocilizumab in a multifailure RA patient previously exposed to anti-TNF-α agents and rituximab.
A 53-year-old man with type II diabetes mellitus was diagnosed with RA in 2003, which began with polyarthritis involving wrists, elbows, ankles, and small hand joints, associated with rheumatoid factor (RF) and anti-citrullinated protein antibodies (ACPA) positivity. Initial therapy with methotrexate at 15 mg/week, due to scarce benefit, was combined with infliximab in 2006 and then, in 2011, with rituximab, due to RA disease flare, and discontinued after 2 years due to poor response. In 2013 laboratory tests showed weak positivity for lupus anticoagulant (LAC) and immunoglobulin (Ig)G anticardiolipin antibodies (aCL IgG), while subsequent controls were negative. From January 2013 the patient received tocilizumab 8 mg/kg monthly combined with methotrexate, with good clinical response. Tocilizumab was interrupted from March to June 2018 for minor orthopaedic procedures, including surgical treatment of tenosynovitis and elbow bursectomy complicated by skin abscess. During this period, the patient continued only methotrexate therapy. In August 2018, he developed sudden right hypochondrial pain. Abdominal computed tomography (CT) scan demonstrated a hypodense splenic lesion compatible with splenic infarction (Fig. 1). Laboratory findings showed D-dimer 2264 ng/ml (<500), fibrinogen 612 mg/dl (>400), and C-reactive protein (CRP) 16.9 mg/dl (<0.2), supporting an ischemic process. Rheumatologic evaluation demonstrated triple positivity for APS laboratory criteria (LAC, aCL IgG, anti-beta-2glycoproteinI (aB2GPI) IgG) associated with the arterial thrombotic event, leading to APS diagnosis. At hospitalization, disease activity score (DAS28) was 4.03; RF and ACPA were markedly elevated, antinuclear antibodies (ANA) showed a low-titer granular pattern, while platelet count and complement fractions were normal (Table 1). The patient was discharged on methotrexate, baricitinib 4 mg/day, and warfarin with an international normalized ratio target range of 2.5–3.5. Steroid therapy was gradually tapered and discontinued in 2020. During follow-up, no recurrent thrombotic events occurred while anticoagulation was maintained (Fig. 2).
Figure 1. Abdominal contrast-enhanced computed tomography scan: left panel and right panel show hypodense areas coming from the hilar region of the spleen in subsequent slices of portal venous phase imaging.
Table 1. Variation of parameters between the three phases of the clinical history of the patient.
Abbreviations: DAS28-ERS, disease activity score in 28 joints using erythrocyte sedimentation rate; ERS, erythrocyte sedimentation rate; CRP, C-reactive protein; aCL IgM, anticardiolipin immunoglobulin M antibodies; aCL IgG, anticardiolipin immunoglobulin G antibodies; aβ2GPI IgM, anti-beta-2 glycoprotein I immunoglobulin M antibodies; aβ2GPI IgG, anti-beta-2 glycoprotein I immunoglobulin G antibodies; LAC, lupus anticoagulant; ACPA, anti-citrullinated protein antibodies; RF, rheumatoid factor.
Figure 2. Longitudinal clinical progression and biomarkers trend.
Abbreviations: DAS28-VES, Disease Activity Score in 28 joints using Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate; ERS: erythrocyte sedimentation rate; CRP, C-reactive protein; aCL IgG, anticardiolipin immunoglobulin G antibodies; LAC, lupus anticoagulant; ACPA, anti-citrullinated protein antibodies; RF, rheumatoid factor.
APS accounts for approximately 5.6% of splenic infarction cases[5], and its coexistence with RA is plausible[2]. However, splenic infarction as the first clinical manifestation of APS during immunosuppressive treatment remains uncommon. This case highlights important aspects of RA management, including molecular immunology, pharmacologic modulation of autoimmunity, and thrombotic risk assessment. Tocilizumab may have acted as a suppressor of autoreactive B-cell clones producing antiphospholipid antibodies (aPLs). Its discontinuation induced a marked serological rebound, progressing from isolated transient positivity to persistent triple positivity, suggesting a central role of interleukin (IL)-6 in controlling pathogenic autoantibody production. High ACPA titers may also have contributed to the prothrombotic state. ACPAs are associated with severe RA, extra-articular manifestations, and accelerated atherosclerosis[6]. Recent evidence indicates that ACPAs activate macrophages and neutrophils through neutrophil extracellular trap formation, promoting endothelial dysfunction and thrombosis[7]. In this setting, ACPAs may have provided a pro-inflammatory scaffold favouring antiphospholipid-mediated thrombosis and splenic infarction[8]. The clinical course supports the “Two-Hit” hypothesis of APS. The first hit consisted of biologic withdrawal, leading to increased CRP and fibrinogen and creating a hyper-reactive vascular environment. The second hit was represented by surgical stress and bacterial superinfection, which probably triggered massive aPL production and thrombosis[9]. The absence of hypocomplementemia and thrombocytopenia excluded rheumatoid vasculitis or catastrophic APS, supporting a primary arterial thrombotic event. This case suggests that even isolated previous aPL positivity should not be underestimated in RA patients with high ACPA titers before biologic discontinuation. Suspension of tocilizumab for more than 3 months likely resulted in complete IL-6 inhibition washout[10]. These findings raise questions regarding the necessity of prolonged biologic withdrawal before minor surgery and emphasize the importance of thrombotic risk profiling in patients with previous aPL positivity. Monitoring inflammatory markers such as CRP and erythrocyte sedimentation rate during biologic suspension and minimizing withdrawal time, also through multidisciplinary consultation, may help reduce thrombotic complications. Finally, despite the patient’s “B-cell oriented” immunologic profile and the previous limited efficacy of rituximab, baricitinib was introduced after anticoagulation because of patient preference for oral therapy. No recurrent thrombosis occurred, suggesting that Janus kinase inhibitors may be a safe therapeutic option in selected patients when associated with adequate anticoagulation and careful monitoring.
References