Cardiac leiomyomatosis misdiagnosed initially as submissive pulmonary embolism: a rare case report
Abdulmajeed Alosail1,2
1 Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, King Faisal University, Al-Hasa, Saudi Arabia
2 Department of Cardiology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
Doi: 10.12890/2023_004173 - European Journal of Case Reports in Internal Medicine - © EFIM 2023
Received: 02/11/2023
Accepted: 06/11/2023
Published: 20/11/2023

How to cite this article: Alosail A. Cardiac leiomyomatosis misdiagnosed initially as submissive pulmonary embolism: a rare case report. EJCRIM 2023;10:doi:10.12890/2023_004173.

Conflicts of Interests: The authors declare there are no competing interests.
Patient Consent: A signed written consent was obtained from the patient to publish her case.
This article is licensed under a Commons Attribution Non-Commercial 4.0 License

ABSTRACT

This case report presents a rare case of cardiac leiomyomatosis misdiagnosed initially as submassive pulmonary embolism in a 39-year-old woman. The patient presented with syncope and hypotension, leading to an initial diagnosis of submassive pulmonary embolism. However, further investigations revealed a right-sided heart mass on echocardiogram. Surgical intervention was carried out, and the patient’s condition was successfully managed. This case emphasizes the importance of considering rare cardiac tumours in the differential diagnosis of pulmonary embolism.

LEARNING POINTS

KEYWORDS

Type A aortic dissection, Bentall procedure, atypical symptoms

INTRODUCTION

Cardiac leiomyomatosis is an extremely rare condition characterized by the presence of smooth muscle tumours within the cardiac chambers. These tumours are usually extensions of intravenous leiomyoma (IVL), which is rare benign smooth muscle cell tumour. The tumour originates in the uterus and intrauterine venous system, and can extend into the right side of the heart and pulmonary arteries[1,2]. Cardiac leiomyomatosis is often misdiagnosed initially due to its rarity and similarity with other cardiac pathologies. Misdiagnosis can lead to delays in appropriate management and potential adverse outcomes for the patient.
Given the rarity and diagnostic challenges associated with cardiac leiomyomatosis, it is important to raise awareness of this condition among healthcare professionals. Early recognition and accurate diagnosis are essential for timely intervention and optimal outcome. This case report aims to contribute to the existing literature on cardiac leiomyomatosis, and to emphasize the importance of considering rare cardiac tumours in the differential diagnosis of pulmonary embolism.

CASE PRESENTATION

A previously healthy 39-year-old woman presented to a local hospital after experiencing syncope. On arrival, her systolic blood pressure was 70 mmHg, but her haemodynamics quickly normalized. An initial CT scan suggested submassive pulmonary embolism, with a large volume of thrombus extending from the right ventricle to the right main pulmonary artery. Consequently, the patient was started on intravenous anticoagulation and considered for thrombolysis. However, further investigations, including an echocardiogram, revealed the presence of a right-sided heart mass.
On physical examination, the patient appeared comfortable with a temperature of 36.7°C (oral), heart rate of 73 beats per minute (peripheral), respiratory rate of 16 breaths per minute, blood pressure of 105/63 mmHg, and oxygen saturation of 99%. A cardiac examination revealed a systolic ejection murmur heard at the base of the heart and a right-sided.

SURGICAL INTERVENTION AND MANAGEMENT

The patient underwent surgical intervention. Intraoperative images revealed an encapsulated tumour arising from the papillary muscle with the involvement of the anterior tricuspid valve leaflet (Fig. 1). A pulmonary artery incision was made, but no tumour or thrombus was found. Clear margins were achieved, and a 31 mm porcine valve was implanted during tricuspid valve replacement. The patient was placed on cardiopulmonary bypass for 57 minutes, with a cross-clamp time of 44 minutes. One chest tube and two right ventricular wires were placed without any complications.

(click to enlarge)

Figure 1. Operative view (left) and (right) tumours removed from the right atrium with the involvement of the anterior tricuspid valve leaflet.

The histopathological examination was consistent with multiple pedunculated, polypoid, lobulated, and worm-like tumours attached to valvular and chordal tissue. The tumour cells consisted of bland spindle-to-epithelioid cells with moderate to abundant eosinophilic cytoplasm. The tumours were diffusely and strongly positive for smooth muscle actin (SMA) and desmin.
Overall, the macroscopic, histomorphological, and immunohistochemical findings are most compatible with intracardiac leiomyomatosis.

DISCUSSION

Cardiac tumours, including leiomyomatosis, account for less than 0.03% of all cardiac neoplasms and are often challenging to diagnose and manage[2]. The symptoms and clinical presentation of cardiac leiomyomatosis can vary widely, ranging from asymptomatic cases to severe heart failure or sudden cardiac death[3]. Common presenting symptoms include palpitations, chest pain, dyspnoea, syncope, or signs of cardiac obstruction[4].
Diagnosing cardiac leiomyomatosis requires a high index of suspicion and the use of various imaging modalities. Echocardiography, cardiac MRI, and CT scans are commonly used to visualize the tumours and identify their location, size, and involvement of adjacent structures[5]. Histopathological examination remains the gold standard to confirm the diagnosis.
Surgical intervention is the main treatment for cardiac leiomyomatosis. The primary goal of surgical management is the complete resection of the tumour with clear margins[6]. In some cases where the tumour involves the cardiac valves, valve replacement may be necessary[7]. Long-term follow-up is crucial due to the potential for recurrence or metastasis.

CONCLUSION

We present a rare case of intracardiac leiomyomatosis misdiagnosed initially as submassive pulmonary embolism. This case highlights the importance of considering rare cardiac tumours in the differential diagnosis of pulmonary embolism, especially when initial management fails to provide the expected results. Early recognition and appropriate surgical intervention are crucial for optimal outcome.

References
  1. Wu CK, Luo JL, Yang CY, Huang YT, Wu XM., Cheng CL. et al. Intravenous leiomyomatosis with intracardiac extension. Intern Med. 2009;48:997-1001
  2. Burke AP, Cowan D, Virmani R. Primary sarcomas of the heart. Cancer 1992;69:387-395.
  3. Yuan SM. Leiomyosarcoma of the heart. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 2010;10:1051-1056.
  4. Pucci A, Gagliardotto P, Zanini C. Surgical treatment of primary cardiac tumours: early and late results in a multicenter experience. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2011;141:e100-e106.
  5. Butany J, Nair V, Naseemuddin A, Nair GM, Catton C, Yau T. Cardiac tumours: diagnosis and management. Lancet Oncol 2005;6:219-228.
  6. Ekmekçi A, Özgür MM, Yıldırım. Cardiac leiomyosarcoma: case report and review of the literature. Turk J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2019;27:282-285.
  7. Maleszewski JJ, Bois MC, Bois JP, Young PM, Stulak JM, Klarich KW. Cardiac leiomyosarcoma: clinicopathologic features and outcomes for 14 consecutive patients. Mayo Clin Proc 2016;91:651-658.